|
Introduction
Clearing lentigines with intense pulsed light (I²PL) is easy, effective and safe (Fig. 1). However, in most cases lentigines must be treated 2-3 times and the parameter are not suitable to erase teleangiectasia. We therefore compared the efficacy of a short double pulse (photo rejuvenation PR) with a long single pulse (vascular treatment) Fig. 2. Results
None of the 24 patients (21f, 3m, mean age 58,3 years, 36-72 years, Tab. 1) had severe or long lasting side effects except 1 case of prolonged erythema (4 weeks) occurring at the single pulse side. In the majority of cases the pigment removal with 2x2,5ms was less efficient compared to 1x10 ms (Fig. 3 and 4): With the short double pulses (2x2.5 ms) an average pigment clearing of 75,6% (SD 23,6) was achieved compared to 81,3% (SD 23,7) using the 10 ms single pulse (p < 0,05), Fig. 5. The patients preferred the single pulse for the continuing treatment Fig. 3b. Pat. MD01452 before (above) and after 10 ms (R) or 2x2.5 ms (L) , fluence 8.5 J/cm² (both sides)
|
Study Design
24 volunteers with lentigines were randomly treated half side with the PR applicator (530-750 nm) of an I²PL source (Ellipse Flex PPT, DDD, Denmark) using 2x2.5 ms on one and 10 ms on the other side. The fluence was kept equal at both sides. On each side clearing and side effects were recorded 1 month after 1 treatment. Conclusion
|
The clearing of pigment was expressed as percentage of improvement (0% - 10% - 20% - … - 80% - 90% - 100%) judged by the patients themselves comparing their before and after photographs. ![]() Fig. 5. Average clearing (%) of lentigines after 1 treatment at different pulse durations
![]() Table 1. List of patients treated for removal of lentigines by IPLS (Ellipse Flex™, PR applicator 550 – 750 nm)
|